RTX 4070Ti vs Teraflux AI3680
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | GPU | ASIC | |
| Power | 268 W | 6840 W | |
| Release | 2024-12 | ||
| Best opportunity |  FIRONetwork |  BTCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $0.29 | $2.60 | |
| Score | 77/100 | 72/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | RTX 4070Ti | Teraflux AI3680 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abelhash | 74.02 MH/s152 W · 487 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Autolykos2 | 161.6 MH/s96 W · 1.683 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| BCD | 40.14 MH/s261 W · 153.8 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake (2s) | 12.22 GH/s255 W · 47.94 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| cuckARoo29 | 9.63 H/s140 W · 0.06879 H/s/W | not supported | |
| cuckAToo32 | 1.13 H/s175 W · 0.006457 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Curvehash | 8.154 MH/s176 W · 46.33 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Equihash(125,4) | 87.82 H/s266 W · 0.3301 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Equihash(144,5) | 111 H/s252 W · 0.4405 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Equihash(192,7) | 55 H/s250 W · 0.22 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Equihash(210,9) | 435 H/s239 W · 1.82 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Etchash | 74.09 MH/s152 W · 487.4 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 74.02 MH/s152 W · 487 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| EvrProgPow | 42.65 MH/s226 W · 188.7 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| FiroPoW | 33.06 MH/s149 W · 221.9 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| FishHash | 48.93 MH/s145 W · 337.4 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| GhostRider | 1.356 kH/s121 W · 11.21 H/s/W | not supported | |
| HeavyHash | 899.6 MH/s279 W · 3.224 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| KarlsenHash | 48.93 MH/s145 W · 337.4 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KAWPOW | 45.11 MH/s230 W · 196.1 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Keccak | 2.439 GH/s289 W · 8.438 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Keccak-C | 2.398 GH/s289 W · 8.299 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| KHeavyHash | 1.289 GH/s279 W · 4.621 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Lyra2REv2 | 142.7 MH/s294 |