GeForce RTX 5070 vs Teraflux AT2880
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | GPU | ASIC | |
| Power | 150 W | 2880 W | |
| Release | |||
| Best opportunity |  ZANONetwork |  BTCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $0.07 | $2.15 | |
| Score | 67/100 | 70/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | GeForce RTX 5070 | Teraflux AT2880 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autolykos2 | 211.3 MH/s95 W · 2.224 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| cuckARoo29 | 8.97 H/s109 W · 0.08229 H/s/W | not supported | |
| cuckAToo32 | 0.6 H/s136 W · 0.004412 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Etchash | 86.28 MH/s133 W · 648.7 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 80 MH/s150 W · 533.3 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| FishHash | 57.83 MH/s126 W · 459 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KarlsenHash | 57.83 MH/s126 W · 459 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KAWPOW | 42.65 MH/s184 W · 231.8 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| NexaPoW | 124.1 MH/s171 W · 725.8 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Octopus | 83.58 MH/s164 W · 509.6 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| ProgPow | 42.99 MH/s185 W · 232.4 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| ProgPowZ | 42.99 MH/s185 W · 232.4 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Qhash | 1.66 GH/s83 W · 20 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA-256 | not supported | 260 TH/s4680 W · 55.56 GH/s/W | |
| XelisHash | 10.59 kH/s76 W · 139.3 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Xelishashv2 | 50 kH/s130 W · 384.6 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Zhash | 80 H/s160 W · 0.5 H/s/W | not supported |