Avalon Nano 3 vs RTX 4070
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | GPU | |
| Power | 140 W | 186 W | |
| Release | 2024-02 | ||
| Best opportunity |  BTCNetwork |  FIRONetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.09 | $0.18 | |
| Score | 56/100 | 73/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Avalon Nano 3 | RTX 4070 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abelhash | not supported | 64.55 MH/s142 W · 454.6 kH/s/W | |
| Autolykos2 | not supported | 122.2 MH/s80 W · 1.528 MH/s/W | |
| BCD | not supported | 31.88 MH/s187 W · 170.5 kH/s/W | |
| BeamHashIII | not supported | 48.56 H/s188 W · 0.2583 H/s/W | |
| Blake (2s) | not supported | 10.96 GH/s199 W · 55.07 MH/s/W | |
| cuckARoo29 | not supported | 8.07 H/s126 W · 0.06405 H/s/W | |
| cuckAToo32 | not supported | 0.99 H/s155 W · 0.006387 H/s/W | |
| CuckooCycle | not supported | 10.11 H/s186 W · 0.05435 H/s/W | |
| Curvehash | not supported | 6.832 MH/s139 W · 49.15 kH/s/W | |
| Equihash(125,4) | not supported | 68.38 H/s186 W · 0.3676 H/s/W | |
| Equihash(144,5) | not supported | 96.3 H/s199 W · 0.4839 H/s/W | |
| Equihash(192,7) | not supported | 45 H/s184 W · 0.2446 H/s/W | |
| Equihash(210,9) | not supported | 368 H/s177 W · 2.079 H/s/W | |
| Etchash | not supported | 65.98 MH/s141 W · 467.9 kH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 62.26 MH/s124 W · 502.1 kH/s/W | |
| EvrProgPow | not supported |