RTX 5050 vs CMP 170HX
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | GPU | GPU | |
| Power | 110 W | ||
| Release | |||
| Best opportunity |  ZANONetwork | ZANONetwork | |
| Profit/day | $0.04 | $0.36 | |
| Score | 67/100 | 74/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | RTX 5050 | CMP 170HX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abelhash | not supported | 160.2 MH/s191 W · 838.6 kH/s/W | |
| Autolykos2 | 78.94 MH/s76 W · 1.039 MH/s/W | 364.8 MH/s167 W · 2.184 MH/s/W | |
| cuckARoo29 | 4 H/s72 W · 0.05556 H/s/W | 11.33 H/s135 W · 0.08393 H/s/W | |
| cuckAToo32 | 0.2 H/s75 W · 0.002667 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Etchash | not supported | 139.1 MH/s169 W · 823.1 kH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 139.1 MH/s169 W · 823.1 kH/s/W | |
| EvrProgPow | not supported | 37.72 MH/s151 W · 249.8 kH/s/W | |
| FishHash | not supported | 108.4 MH/s198 W · 547.3 kH/s/W | |
| KarlsenHash | not supported | 108.4 MH/s198 W · 547.3 kH/s/W | |
| KAWPOW | 20.38 MH/s112 W · 182 kH/s/W | 51.02 MH/s185 W · 275.8 kH/s/W | |
| NexaPoW | 50.33 MH/s101 W · 498.3 kH/s/W | 91.74 MH/s140 W · 655.3 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPow | 20.56 MH/s110 W · 186.9 kH/s/W | 63.87 MH/s221 W · 289 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPowZ | 20.56 MH/s110 W · 186.9 kH/s/W | 63.87 MH/s221 W · 289 kH/s/W | |
| Qhash | 692 MH/s38 W · 18.21 MH/s/W | 676 MH/s80 W · 8.45 MH/s/W | |
| SHA3x | not supported | 447 MH/s95 W · 4.705 MH/s/W | |
| XelisHash | 4.52 kH/s61 W · 74.1 H/s/W | 30.11 kH/s134 W · 224.7 H/s/W |