RTX 5050 vs CMP 100-210
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | GPU | GPU | |
| Power | 110 W | 162 W | |
| Release | |||
| Best opportunity |  ZANONetwork | ZANONetwork | |
| Profit/day | $0.08 | $0.30 | |
| Score | 70/100 | 73/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | RTX 5050 | CMP 100-210 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autolykos2 | 78.94 MH/s76 W · 1.039 MH/s/W | 159.3 MH/s110 W · 1.448 MH/s/W | |
| cuckARoo29 | 4 H/s72 W · 0.05556 H/s/W | 7.27 H/s123 W · 0.05911 H/s/W | |
| cuckAToo32 | 0.2 H/s75 W · 0.002667 H/s/W | not supported | |
| FishHash | not supported | 57.43 MH/s128 W · 448.7 kH/s/W | |
| KarlsenHash | not supported | 57.43 MH/s128 W · 448.7 kH/s/W | |
| KAWPOW | 20.38 MH/s112 W · 182 kH/s/W | 44.26 MH/s199 W · 222.4 kH/s/W | |
| MeowPow | not supported | 48.9 MH/s196 W · 249.5 kH/s/W | |
| NexaPoW | 50.33 MH/s101 W · 498.3 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Octopus | not supported | 54.37 MH/s162 W · 335.6 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPow | 20.56 MH/s110 W · 186.9 kH/s/W | 48.26 MH/s205 W · 235.4 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPowZ | 20.56 MH/s110 W · 186.9 kH/s/W | 48.26 MH/s205 W · 235.4 kH/s/W | |
| Qhash | 692 MH/s38 W · 18.21 MH/s/W | 912 MH/s101 W · 9.03 MH/s/W | |
| SHA3x | not supported | 390 MH/s97 W · 4.021 MH/s/W | |
| XelisHash | 4.52 kH/s61 W · 74.1 H/s/W | 9.03 kH/s76 W · 118.8 H/s/W |