GeForce RTX 5070 Ti vs Giant+ A2000
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | GPU | ASIC | |
| Power | 100 W | 430 W | |
| Release | 2017-08 | ||
| Best opportunity |  ZANONetwork |  DASHNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $0.11 | $-0.80 | |
| Score | 68/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | Giant+ A2000 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autolykos2 | 195 MH/s100 W · 1.95 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake3 | 3.3 GH/s170 W · 19.41 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| cuckARoo29 | 12.23 H/s137 W · 0.08927 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Etchash | 107.1 MH/s182 W · 588.4 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 88 MH/s150 W · 586.7 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| FishHash | 71.31 MH/s171 W · 417 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KarlsenHash | 71.31 MH/s171 W · 417 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KAWPOW | 44.05 MH/s249 W · 176.9 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| NexaPoW | 190.5 MH/s243 W · 783.9 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Octopus | 98.63 MH/s183 W · 539 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| ProgPow | 53.84 MH/s231 W · 233.1 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| ProgPowZ | 53.84 MH/s231 W · 233.1 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Qhash | 2.42 GH/s105 W · 23.05 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Quark | not supported | 2 GH/s248 W · 8.065 MH/s/W | |
| Qubit | not supported | 2 GH/s280 W · 7.143 MH/s/W | |
| X11 | not supported | 2 GH/s430 W · 4.651 MH/s/W | |
| X13 | not supported | 1.6 GH/s430 W · 3.721 MH/s/W | |
| X14 | not supported | 1.6 GH/s450 W · 3.556 MH/s/W | |
| X15 | not supported | 2 GH/s450 W · 4.444 MH/s/W | |
| X17 | not supported | 1.6 GH/s440 W · 3.636 MH/s/W | |
| XelisHash | 13.96 kH/s88 W · 158.6 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Xelishashv2 | 64 kH/s150 W · 426.7 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Zhash | 100 H/s170 W · 0.5882 H/s/W | not supported |