CMP 30HX vs F1-Ultra
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | GPU | FPGA | |
| Power | 113 W | 700 W | |
| Release | |||
| Best opportunity |  ZANONetwork |  CKBNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.04 | $-2.18 | |
| Score | 57/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | CMP 30HX | F1-Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| cuckARoo29 | 2.5 H/s69 W · 0.03623 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Eaglesong | not supported | 26.5 GH/s1137 W · 23.31 MH/s/W | |
| Etchash | 30.59 MH/s82 W · 373 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 27.43 MH/s113 W · 242.7 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| EvrProgPow | 11.54 MH/s88 W · 131.1 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| FishHash | 20.53 MH/s75 W · 273.7 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KarlsenHash | 20.53 MH/s75 W · 273.7 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KAWPOW | 10.75 MH/s80 W · 134.4 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| NexaPoW | 32.26 MH/s75 W · 430.1 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Odocrypt | not supported | 5.65 GH/s1157 W · 4.883 MH/s/W | |
| ProgPow | 9.96 MH/s78 W · 127.7 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| ProgPowZ | 9.96 MH/s78 W · 127.7 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Qhash | 566 MH/s57 W · 9.93 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA3x | 171 MH/s62 W · 2.758 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| vBlake2 | not supported | 15.5 GH/s700 W · 22.14 MH/s/W | |
| XelisHash | 3.62 kH/s65 W · 55.69 H/s/W | not supported |