CMP 170HX vs RTX 5050
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | GPU | GPU | |
| Power | 110 W | ||
| Release | |||
| Best opportunity |  ZANONetwork | ZANONetwork | |
| Profit/day | $0.33 | $0.03 | |
| Score | 74/100 | 66/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | CMP 170HX | RTX 5050 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abelhash | 160.2 MH/s191 W · 838.6 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Autolykos2 | 364.8 MH/s167 W · 2.184 MH/s/W | 78.94 MH/s76 W · 1.039 MH/s/W | |
| cuckARoo29 | 11.33 H/s135 W · 0.08393 H/s/W | 4 H/s72 W · 0.05556 H/s/W | |
| cuckAToo32 | not supported | 0.2 H/s75 W · 0.002667 H/s/W | |
| Etchash | 139.1 MH/s169 W · 823.1 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 139.1 MH/s169 W · 823.1 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| EvrProgPow | 37.72 MH/s151 W · 249.8 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| FishHash | 108.4 MH/s198 W · 547.3 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KarlsenHash | 108.4 MH/s198 W · 547.3 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KAWPOW | 51.02 MH/s185 W · 275.8 kH/s/W | 20.38 MH/s112 W · 182 kH/s/W | |
| NexaPoW | 91.74 MH/s140 W · 655.3 kH/s/W | 50.33 MH/s101 W · 498.3 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPow | 63.87 MH/s221 W · 289 kH/s/W | 20.56 MH/s110 W · 186.9 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPowZ | 63.87 MH/s221 W · 289 kH/s/W | 20.56 MH/s110 W · 186.9 kH/s/W | |
| Qhash | 676 MH/s80 W · 8.45 MH/s/W | 692 MH/s38 W · 18.21 MH/s/W | |
| SHA3x | 447 MH/s95 W · 4.705 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| XelisHash | 30.11 kH/s134 W · 224.7 H/s/W | 4.52 kH/s61 W · 74.1 H/s/W |