M1 vs F5M
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 850 W | 3120 W | |
| Release | 2020-01 | ||
| Best opportunity |  CKBNetwork |  BCHNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-1.63 | $-4.05 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | M1 | F5M | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | 90 GH/s850 W · 105.9 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Eaglesong | 31.5 GH/s850 W · 37.06 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Handshake | 5.8 GH/s850 W · 6.824 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA-256 | not supported | 52 TH/s3120 W · 16.67 GH/s/W | |
| Tellor | 12 GH/s750 W · 16 MH/s/W | not supported |