X4-Q-C vs GeForce RTX 5070 Ti
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | GPU | |
| Power | 365 W | 100 W | |
| Release | |||
| Best opportunity |  ETCNetwork |  ZANONetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.09 | $0.08 | |
| Score | 63/100 | 67/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | X4-Q-C | GeForce RTX 5070 Ti | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autolykos2 | not supported | 195 MH/s100 W · 1.95 MH/s/W | |
| Blake3 | not supported | 3.3 GH/s170 W · 19.41 MH/s/W | |
| cuckARoo29 | not supported | 12.23 H/s137 W · 0.08927 H/s/W | |
| Etchash | 900 MH/s365 W · 2.466 MH/s/W | 107.1 MH/s182 W · 588.4 kH/s/W | |
| Ethash | 900 MH/s365 W · 2.466 MH/s/W | 88 MH/s150 W · 586.7 kH/s/W | |
| FishHash | not supported | 71.31 MH/s171 W · 417 kH/s/W | |
| KarlsenHash | not supported | 71.31 MH/s171 W · 417 kH/s/W | |
| KAWPOW | not supported | 44.05 MH/s249 W · 176.9 kH/s/W | |
| NexaPoW | not supported | 190.5 MH/s243 W · 783.9 kH/s/W | |
| Octopus | not supported | 98.63 MH/s183 W · 539 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPow | not supported | 53.84 MH/s231 W · 233.1 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPowZ | not supported | 53.84 MH/s231 W · 233.1 kH/s/W | |
| Qhash | not supported | 2.42 GH/s105 W · 23.05 MH/s/W | |
| XelisHash | not supported | 13.96 kH/s88 W · 158.6 H/s/W | |
| Xelishashv2 | not supported | 64 kH/s150 W · 426.7 H/s/W | |
| Zhash | not supported | 100 H/s170 W · 0.5882 H/s/W |