T2 Turbo+ 32T vs CMP 70HX
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | GPU | |
| Power | 2200 W | ||
| Release | 2018-09 | ||
| Best opportunity |  BCHNetwork |  ZANONetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-3.05 | $-0.11 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 57/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | T2 Turbo+ 32T | CMP 70HX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autolykos2 | not supported | 166.5 MH/s140 W · 1.189 MH/s/W | |
| cuckARoo29 | not supported | 4.67 H/s147 W · 0.03177 H/s/W | |
| Etchash | not supported | 80.76 MH/s199 W · 405.8 kH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 80.76 MH/s199 W · 405.8 kH/s/W | |
| FishHash | not supported | 52.88 MH/s189 W · 279.8 kH/s/W | |
| KarlsenHash | not supported | 52.88 MH/s189 W · 279.8 kH/s/W | |
| KAWPOW | not supported | 28.81 MH/s195 W · 147.7 kH/s/W | |
| NexaPoW | not supported | 55.78 MH/s141 W · 395.6 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPow | not supported | 28.85 MH/s199 W · 145 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPowZ | not supported | 28.85 MH/s199 W · 145 kH/s/W | |
| SHA-256 | 32 TH/s2200 W · 14.55 GH/s/W | not supported |