A11 vs Imperium F2
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 2300 W | 990 W | |
| Release | 2024-09 | ||
| Best opportunity |  BCHNetwork |  HNSNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-3.81 | $-1.90 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 40/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | A11 | Imperium F2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | not supported | 71 GH/s1050 W · 67.62 MH/s/W | |
| Blake3 | 1.2 TH/s2300 W · 521.7 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Etchash | 1.5 GH/s2500 W · 600 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 1.5 GH/s2300 W · 652.2 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Handshake | not supported | 6.1 GH/s990 W · 6.162 MH/s/W | |
| SHA-256 | 72 TH/s3400 W · 21.18 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA512256d | 3.2 TH/s2300 W · 1.391 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| Tellor | not supported | 9 GH/s780 W · 11.54 MH/s/W |