KS3M vs GeForce RTX 5090
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | GPU | |
| Power | 3400 W | 360 W | |
| Release | 2023-10 | ||
| Best opportunity |  KASNetwork |  ZANONetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-5.51 | $0.24 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 68/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | KS3M | GeForce RTX 5090 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abelhash | not supported | 201.9 MH/s380 W · 531.3 kH/s/W | |
| Autolykos2 | not supported | 563.7 MH/s271 W · 2.08 MH/s/W | |
| Blake3 | not supported | 7.5 GH/s400 W · 18.75 MH/s/W | |
| cuckARoo29 | not supported | 28.73 H/s387 W · 0.07424 H/s/W | |
| cuckAToo32 | not supported | 2 H/s434 W · 0.004608 H/s/W | |
| Etchash | not supported | 215.8 MH/s405 W · 532.8 kH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 160 MH/s290 W · 551.7 kH/s/W | |
| FishHash | not supported | 133.5 MH/s336 W · 397.3 kH/s/W | |
| KarlsenHash | not supported | 133.5 MH/s336 W · 397.3 kH/s/W | |
| KAWPOW | not supported | 95.94 MH/s463 W · 207.2 kH/s/W | |
| KHeavyHash | 6 TH/s3400 W · 1.765 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| NexaPoW | not supported | 371 MH/s494 W · 751 kH/s/W | |
| Octopus | not supported | 214.7 MH/s476 W · 451.1 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPow | not supported | 97.32 MH/s458 W · 212.5 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPowZ | not supported | 97.32 MH/s458 W · 212.5 kH/s/W | |
| Qhash | not supported | 5.31 GH/s257 W · 20.66 MH/s/W | |
| SHA3x | not supported | 2.214 GH/s370 W · 5.984 MH/s/W | |
| XelisHash | not supported | 28.92 kH/s215 W · 134.5 H/s/W | |
| Xelishashv2 | not supported | 130 kH/s350 W · 371.4 H/s/W | |
| Zhash | not supported | 190 H/s280 W · 0.6786 H/s/W |