Mars H1 vs X
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 2800 W | 630 W | |
| Release | 2020-07 | ||
| Best opportunity |  HNSNetwork |  QKCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-5.34 | $0.18 | |
| Score | 40/100 | 63/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Mars H1 | X | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etchash | not supported | 420 MH/s210 W · 2 MH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 420 MH/s210 W · 2 MH/s/W | |
| Handshake | 88 GH/s2800 W · 31.43 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Myr-Groestl | not supported | 10 GH/s150 W · 66.67 MH/s/W | |
| NIST5 | not supported | 10 GH/s250 W · 40 MH/s/W | |
| Quark | not supported | 10 GH/s360 W · 27.78 MH/s/W | |
| Qubit | not supported | 10 GH/s390 W · 25.64 MH/s/W | |
| SHA-256 | not supported | 150 GH/s60 W · 2.5 GH/s/W | |
| Skein | not supported | 5 GH/s120 W · 41.67 MH/s/W | |
| X11 | not supported | 10 GH/s630 W · 15.87 MH/s/W | |
| X11Gost | not supported | 1.35 GH/s200 W · 6.75 MH/s/W |