Heatbit Trio vs P104-100
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | GPU | |
| Power | 400 W | 150 W | |
| Release | 2025-02 | 2017-11 | |
| Best opportunity |  BTCNetwork |  MONANetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.33 | $0.15 | |
| Score | 53/100 | 67/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Heatbit Trio | P104-100 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abelhash | not supported | 29.85 MH/s135 W · 221.1 kH/s/W | |
| Allium | not supported | 7.786 MH/s150 W · 51.91 kH/s/W | |
| Argon2d-dyn | not supported | 144.3 kH/s149 W · 968.6 H/s/W | |
| Argon2d250 | not supported | 543.4 kH/s169 W · 3.216 kH/s/W | |
| Argon2d4096 | not supported | 28.53 kH/s168 W · 169.8 H/s/W | |
| Autolykos2 | not supported | 75.92 MH/s129 W · 588.5 kH/s/W | |
| BCD | not supported | 19.82 MH/s116 W · 170.8 kH/s/W | |
| BeamHashII | not supported | 30.91 H/s100 W · 0.3091 H/s/W | |
| BeamHashIII | not supported | 17.13 H/s144 W · 0.1189 H/s/W | |
| Blake (14r) | not supported | 339.9 MH/s95 W · 3.578 MH/s/W | |
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | not supported | 686.7 MH/s149 W · 4.609 MH/s/W | |
| Blake (2s) | not supported | 3.306 GH/s118 W · 28.02 MH/s/W | |
| C11 | not supported | 24.12 MH/s123 W · 196.1 kH/s/W | |
| Chukwa | not supported | 67.43 kH/s179 W · 376.7 H/s/W | |
| Chukwa2 | not supported | 25.33 kH/s173 W · 146.4 H/s/W | |
| ChukwaWRKZ | not supported | 95.26 kH/s |