GTX 1660 Super vs STU-U6
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | GPU | ASIC | |
| Power | 79 W | 2200 W | |
| Release | 2019-11 | ||
| Best opportunity |  MONANetwork |  DASHNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $0.18 | $-1.32 | |
| Score | 68/100 | 58/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | GTX 1660 Super | STU-U6 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0x10 | 7.83 MH/s84 W · 93.22 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Allium | 5.836 MH/s78 W · 74.83 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Argon2d-dyn | 141 kH/s80 W · 1.763 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Argon2d250 | 563.8 kH/s84 W · 6.712 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Argon2d4096 | 30.61 kH/s75 W · 408.1 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Astralhash | 8.091 MH/s100 W · 80.91 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Autolykos2 | 52.54 MH/s112 W · 469.1 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| BCD | 14.72 MH/s75 W · 196.2 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| BeamHashII | 16.53 H/s84 W · 0.1968 H/s/W | not supported | |
| BeamHashIII | 13.59 H/s117 W · 0.1162 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake (14r) | 2.233 GH/s125 W · 17.86 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake (2b) | 1.54 GH/s123 W · 12.52 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | 633.5 MH/s79 W · 8.019 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake (2s) | 3.275 GH/s120 W · 27.29 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake3 | 507.9 MH/s | not supported | |
| BMW512 | 484.9 MH/s42 W · 11.54 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| C11 | 13.84 MH/s45 W · 307.6 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Chukwa | 72.11 kH/s126 W · 572.3 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Chukwa2 | 25.11 kH/s84 W · 298.9 H/s/W | not supported | |
| ChukwaWRKZ | 105.8 kH/s79 W · 1.34 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| CNReverseWaltz | 681.2 H/s90 W · 7.569 H/s/W | not supported | |
| CryptoNightAlloy | 278.5 H/s80 W · 3.481 H/s/W | not supported | |
| CryptoNightArto | 541.4 H/s76 W · 7.123 H/s/W | not supported | |
| CryptoNightConceal | 1.022 kH/s77 W · 13.28 H/s/W | not supported | |