A11 vs X2
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 2300 W | 980 W | |
| Release | 2024-09 | 2019-06 | |
| Best opportunity |  ETCNetwork | ||
| Profit/day | $-3.78 | ||
| Score | 49/100 | ||
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | A11 | X2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s) | not supported | 1.2 TH/s980 W · 1.224 GH/s/W | |
| Blake3 | 1.2 TH/s2300 W · 521.7 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Etchash | 1.5 GH/s2500 W · 600 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 1.5 GH/s2500 W · 600 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Keccak | not supported | 75 GH/s980 W · 76.53 MH/s/W | |
| Myr-Groestl | not supported | 300 GH/s980 W · 306.1 MH/s/W | |
| SHA-256 | 72 TH/s3400 W · 21.18 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA512256d | 3.2 TH/s2300 W · 1.391 GH/s/W | not supported |