Zig M1 vs SC1 Dual
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 200 W | 900 W | |
| Release | 2018-11 | 2019-03 | |
| Best opportunity |  GRSNetwork |  SCPNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.06 | $-1.68 | |
| Score | 40/100 | 33/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Zig M1 | SC1 Dual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2b-Sia) | not supported | 1.1 TH/s900 W · 1.222 GH/s/W | |
| Blake (2b) | not supported | 1.1 TH/s900 W · 1.222 GH/s/W | |
| Groestl | 2.61 GH/s200 W · 13.05 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| LBRY | 1.54 GH/s11 W · 140 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Lyra2REv2 | 192 MH/s25 W · 7.68 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Myr-Groestl | 4.3 GH/s220 W · 19.55 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Pascal | 2.3 GH/s3 W · 766.7 MH/s/W | not supported |