CMP 170HX vs F1-Ultra
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | GPU | FPGA | |
| Power | 700 W | ||
| Release | |||
| Best opportunity |  ZANONetwork |  CKBNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $0.28 | $-2.18 | |
| Score | 73/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | CMP 170HX | F1-Ultra | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abelhash | 160.2 MH/s191 W · 838.6 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Autolykos2 | 364.8 MH/s167 W · 2.184 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| cuckARoo29 | 11.33 H/s135 W · 0.08393 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Eaglesong | not supported | 26.5 GH/s1137 W · 23.31 MH/s/W | |
| Etchash | 139.1 MH/s169 W · 823.1 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 139.1 MH/s169 W · 823.1 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| EvrProgPow | 37.72 MH/s151 W · 249.8 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| FishHash | 108.4 MH/s198 W · 547.3 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KarlsenHash | 108.4 MH/s198 W · 547.3 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KAWPOW | 51.02 MH/s185 W · 275.8 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| NexaPoW | 91.74 MH/s140 W · 655.3 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Odocrypt | not supported | 5.65 GH/s1157 W · 4.883 MH/s/W | |
| ProgPow | 63.87 MH/s221 W · 289 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| ProgPowZ | 63.87 MH/s221 W · 289 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Qhash | 676 MH/s80 W · 8.45 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA3x | 447 MH/s95 W · 4.705 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| vBlake2 | not supported | 15.5 GH/s700 W · 22.14 MH/s/W | |
| XelisHash | 30.11 kH/s134 W · 224.7 H/s/W | not supported |