Avalon Nano 3 vs CMP 170HX
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | GPU | |
| Power | 140 W | ||
| Release | |||
| Best opportunity |  BTCNetwork |  ZANONetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.10 | $0.20 | |
| Score | 55/100 | 71/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Avalon Nano 3 | CMP 170HX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autolykos2 | not supported | 364.8 MH/s167 W · 2.184 MH/s/W | |
| cuckARoo29 | not supported | 11.33 H/s135 W · 0.08393 H/s/W | |
| Etchash | not supported | 139.1 MH/s169 W · 823.1 kH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 139.1 MH/s169 W · 823.1 kH/s/W | |
| EvrProgPow | not supported | 37.72 MH/s151 W · 249.8 kH/s/W | |
| FishHash | not supported | 108.4 MH/s198 W · 547.3 kH/s/W | |
| KarlsenHash | not supported | 108.4 MH/s198 W · 547.3 kH/s/W | |
| KAWPOW | not supported | 51.02 MH/s185 W · 275.8 kH/s/W | |
| NexaPoW | not supported | 91.74 MH/s140 W · 655.3 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPow | not supported | 63.87 MH/s221 W · 289 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPowZ | not supported | 63.87 MH/s221 W · 289 kH/s/W | |
| Qhash | not supported | 676 MH/s80 W · 8.45 MH/s/W | |
| SHA-256 | 4 TH/s140 W · 28.57 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA3x | not supported | 447 MH/s95 W · 4.705 MH/s/W | |
| XelisHash | not supported | 30.11 kH/s134 W · 224.7 H/s/W |