EZ100 vs RTX 4090
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | GPU | |
| Power | 2300 W | ||
| Release | |||
| Best opportunity |  ETCNetwork |  FIRONetwork | |
| Profit/day | $3.99 | $0.16 | |
| Score | 76/100 | 69/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | EZ100 | RTX 4090 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abelhash | not supported | 124.7 MH/s249 W · 500.8 kH/s/W | |
| Autolykos2 | not supported | 265.8 MH/s183 W · 1.453 MH/s/W | |
| cuckARoo29 | not supported | 16.63 H/s238 W · 0.06987 H/s/W | |
| cuckAToo32 | not supported | 1.65 H/s273 W · 0.006044 H/s/W | |
| CuckooCycle | not supported | 17.6 H/s268 W · 0.06567 H/s/W | |
| Etchash | 12.5 GH/s2300 W · 5.435 MH/s/W | 124.7 MH/s249 W · 500.8 kH/s/W | |
| Ethash | 12.5 GH/s2300 W · 5.435 MH/s/W | 124.7 MH/s249 W · 500.8 kH/s/W | |
| FiroPoW | not supported | 64.82 MH/s299 W · 216.8 kH/s/W | |
| FishHash | not supported | 82.58 MH/s240 W · 344.1 kH/s/W | |
| KarlsenHash | not supported | 82.58 MH/s240 W · 344.1 kH/s/W | |
| KAWPOW | not supported | 65 MH/s299 W · 217.4 kH/s/W | |
| NexaPoW | not supported | 329.3 MH/s445 W · 740 kH/s/W | |
| Octopus | not supported | 123.1 MH/s279 W · 441.4 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPow | not supported | 64.57 MH/s299 W · 216 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPowZ | not supported | 64.57 MH/s299 W · 216 kH/s/W | |
| Qhash | not supported | 4.823 GH/s259 W · 18.62 MH/s/W | |
| SHA3x | not supported | 1.653 GH/s264 W · 6.261 MH/s/W | |
| Verthash | not supported | 1.82 MH/s144 W · 12.64 kH/s/W | |
| XelisHash | not supported | 15.7 kH/s150 W · 104.7 H/s/W |