Teraflux AH3880 vs CMP 30HX
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | GPU | |
| Power | 10740 W | 113 W | |
| Release | 2025-03 | ||
| Best opportunity |  BTCNetwork |  ZANONetwork | |
| Profit/day | $5.15 | $-0.05 | |
| Score | 72/100 | 56/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Teraflux AH3880 | CMP 30HX | |
|---|---|---|---|
| cuckARoo29 | not supported | 2.5 H/s69 W · 0.03623 H/s/W | |
| Etchash | not supported | 30.59 MH/s82 W · 373 kH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 27.43 MH/s113 W · 242.7 kH/s/W | |
| EvrProgPow | not supported | 11.54 MH/s88 W · 131.1 kH/s/W | |
| FishHash | not supported | 20.53 MH/s75 W · 273.7 kH/s/W | |
| KarlsenHash | not supported | 20.53 MH/s75 W · 273.7 kH/s/W | |
| KAWPOW | not supported | 10.75 MH/s80 W · 134.4 kH/s/W | |
| NexaPoW | not supported | 32.26 MH/s75 W · 430.1 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPow | not supported | 9.96 MH/s78 W · 127.7 kH/s/W | |
| ProgPowZ | not supported | 9.96 MH/s78 W · 127.7 kH/s/W | |
| Qhash | not supported | 566 MH/s57 W · 9.93 MH/s/W | |
| SHA-256 | 400 TH/s5920 W · 67.57 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA3x | not supported | 171 MH/s62 W · 2.758 MH/s/W | |
| XelisHash | not supported | 3.62 kH/s65 W · 55.69 H/s/W |