E3 vs A11
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 760 W | 2300 W | |
| Release | 2018-07 | 2024-09 | |
| Best opportunity |  QKCNetwork |  BCHNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-1.18 | $-3.97 | |
| Score | 39/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | E3 | A11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake3 | not supported | 1.2 TH/s2300 W · 521.7 MH/s/W | |
| Etchash | not supported | 1.5 GH/s2500 W · 600 kH/s/W | |
| Ethash | 190 MH/s760 W · 250 kH/s/W | 1.5 GH/s2300 W · 652.2 kH/s/W | |
| SHA-256 | not supported | 72 TH/s3400 W · 21.18 GH/s/W | |
| SHA3x | 14.88 GH/s620 W · 24 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA512256d | 11 GH/s600 W · 18.33 MH/s/W | 3.2 TH/s2300 W · 1.391 GH/s/W |