EPYC 7532 vs Core Ultra 9 285K
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | CPU | CPU | |
| Power | 200 W | 147 W | |
| Release | |||
| Best opportunity | ∞Multi NiceHash |  XMRNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.38 | $0.15 | |
| Score | 31/100 | 73/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | EPYC 7532 | Core Ultra 9 285K | |
|---|---|---|---|
| GhostRider | 8.495 kH/s200 W · 42.48 H/s/W | not supported | |
| RandomX | not supported | 11.34 kH/s147 W · 77.14 H/s/W | |
| VerusHash | 58.71 MH/s200 W · 293.6 kH/s/W | 50.4 MH/s203 W · 248.3 kH/s/W |