U2 vs F5M
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 1600 W | 3120 W | |
| Release | 2018-09 | 2020-01 | |
| Best opportunity |  SCNetwork |  BCHNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.26 | $-4.03 | |
| Score | 43/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | U2 | F5M | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2b) | 5.5 TH/s1600 W · 3.438 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA-256 | not supported | 52 TH/s3120 W · 16.67 GH/s/W |