RX 7900 XTX vs DCR1 Slim
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | GPU | ASIC | |
| Power | 500 W | ||
| Release | 2018-05 | ||
| Best opportunity | |||
| Profit/day | $0.00016 | ||
| Score | 89/100 | ||
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | RX 7900 XTX | DCR1 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abelhash | 98.69 MH/s207 W · 476.8 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Astralhash | 91.48 MH/s | not supported | |
| Autolykos2 | 193.9 MH/s219 W · 885.4 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| BCD | 32.18 MH/s | not supported | |
| Blake (14r) | not supported | 1.2 TH/s500 W · 2.4 GH/s/W | |
| Blake (2s) | 14.33 GH/s | not supported | |
| C11 | 36.72 MH/s | not supported | |
| cuckARoo29 | 13.62 H/s225 W · 0.06053 H/s/W | not supported | |
| cuckAToo32 | 1.48 H/s230 W · 0.006435 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Curvehash | 24.16 MH/s | not supported | |
| Equihash(125,4) | 76.58 H/s | not supported | |
| Equihash(144,5) | 116.2 H/s | not supported | |
| Equihash(192,7) | 89.41 H/s | not supported | |
| Equihash(210,9) | 423.9 H/s | not supported | |
| Etchash | 101.1 MH/s239 W · 423 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 98.69 MH/s207 W · 476.8 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| EvrProgPow | 56.25 MH/s303 W · 185.6 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| FiroPoW | 52.07 MH/s | not supported | |
| FishHash | 66.16 MH/s203 W · 325.9 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| GhostRider | 2.498 kH/s | not supported | |
| HeavyHash | 1.074 GH/s | not supported | |
| KarlsenHash | 66.16 MH/s203 W · 325.9 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KAWPOW | 58.39 MH/s300 W · 194.6 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KHeavyHash | 720.6 MH/s | not supported | |
| Lyra2REv2 | 185.9 MH/s | not supported | |
| MeowPow | 57.2 MH/s250 W · 228.8 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| NexaPoW | 97.6 MH/s233 W · 418.9 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Octopus | 111.4 MH/s283 W · 393.6 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| PHI1612 | 97.68 MH/s | not supported | |