RX 6400 vs Quadruple Mini Miner
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | GPU | ASIC | |
| Power | 160 W | ||
| Release | 2016-08 | ||
| Best opportunity |  ETCNetwork |  DASHNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $0.0065 | $-0.30 | |
| Score | 89/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | RX 6400 | Quadruple Mini Miner | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etchash | 7.476 MH/s | not supported | |
| FiroPoW | 5.21 MH/s25 W · 208.4 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KAWPOW | 7.51 MH/s32 W · 234.7 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| NexaPoW | 10.4 MH/s21 W · 495.2 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Quark | not supported | 600 MH/s100 W · 6 MH/s/W | |
| Qubit | not supported | 600 MH/s112 W · 5.357 MH/s/W | |
| X11 | not supported | 600 MH/s160 W · 3.75 MH/s/W | |
| X13 | not supported | 600 MH/s184 W · 3.261 MH/s/W | |
| X17 | not supported | 600 MH/s188 W · 3.191 MH/s/W |