RX 6400 vs Giant A900
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | GPU | ASIC | |
| Power | 217 W | ||
| Release | 2016-10 | ||
| Best opportunity |  ETCNetwork |  DASHNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $0.0061 | $-0.41 | |
| Score | 89/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | RX 6400 | Giant A900 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etchash | 7.476 MH/s | not supported | |
| FiroPoW | 5.21 MH/s25 W · 208.4 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KAWPOW | 7.51 MH/s32 W · 234.7 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| NexaPoW | 10.4 MH/s21 W · 495.2 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Quark | not supported | 900 MH/s132 W · 6.818 MH/s/W | |
| Qubit | not supported | 900 MH/s146 W · 6.164 MH/s/W | |
| X11 | not supported | 900 MH/s217 W · 4.147 MH/s/W | |
| X13 | not supported | 900 MH/s255 W · 3.529 MH/s/W | |
| X14 | not supported | 900 MH/s263 W · 3.422 MH/s/W | |
| X15 | not supported | 900 MH/s270 W · 3.333 MH/s/W | |
| X17 | not supported | 900 MH/s263 W · 3.422 MH/s/W |