RTX A4000 vs Avalon Nano 3S
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | GPU | ASIC | |
| Power | 123 W | 140 W | |
| Release | 2025-01 | ||
| Best opportunity |  ZANONetwork |  BTCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $0.02 | $-0.02 | |
| Score | 65/100 | 64/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | RTX A4000 | Avalon Nano 3S | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abelhash | 57.37 MH/s112 W · 512.2 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Autolykos2 | 140.6 MH/s139 W · 1.012 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| cuckAToo32 | 0.45 H/s105 W · 0.004286 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Equihash(125,4) | 36.77 H/s133 W · 0.2765 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Etchash | 58.54 MH/s120 W · 487.8 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 58.55 MH/s118 W · 496.2 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| FishHash | 38.22 MH/s110 W · 347.5 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KarlsenHash | 38.22 MH/s110 W · 347.5 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KAWPOW | 26.11 MH/s139 W · 187.8 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| NexaPoW | 79.84 MH/s133 W · 600.3 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Octopus | 47.46 MH/s135 W · 351.6 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| ProgPow | 27.1 MH/s139 W · 195 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| ProgPowZ | 27.1 MH/s139 W · 195 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA-256 | not supported | 6 TH/s140 W · 42.86 GH/s/W | |
| Verthash | 914 kH/s92 W · 9.935 kH/s/W | not supported |