RTX A2000 6GB vs Giant A900
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | GPU | ASIC | |
| Power | 50 W | 217 W | |
| Release | 2016-10 | ||
| Best opportunity |  BEAMNetwork |  DASHNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.01 | $-0.41 | |
| Score | 63/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | RTX A2000 6GB | Giant A900 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Autolykos2 | 100 MH/s80 W · 1.25 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| BeamHashIII | 21 H/s80 W · 0.2625 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake3 | 600 MH/s50 W · 12 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| cuckAToo32 | 0.18 H/s80 W · 0.00225 H/s/W | not supported | |
| DynexSolve | 3 kH/s60 W · 50 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 39 MH/s80 W · 487.5 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| EvrProgPow | 15 MH/s80 W · 187.5 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| FishHash | 26 MH/s80 W · 325 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| IronFish | 5.3 GH/s50 W · 106 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| KAWPOW | 15 MH/s80 W · 187.5 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| KHeavyHash | 290 MH/s60 W · 4.833 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Meraki | 39 MH/s80 W · 487.5 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| NexaPoW | 34 MH/s70 W · 485.7 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Pyrin | 2.4 GH/s70 W · 34.29 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Quark | not supported | 900 MH/s132 W · 6.818 MH/s/W | |
| Qubit | not supported | 900 MH/s146 W · 6.164 MH/s/W | |
| SHA-256 | 400 MH/s60 W · 6.667 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ton | 1.4 GH/s80 W · 17.5 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Verthash | 750 kH/s80 W · 9.375 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| X11 | not supported | 900 MH/s217 W · 4.147 MH/s/W | |
| X13 | not supported | 900 MH/s255 W · 3.529 MH/s/W | |
| X14 | not supported | 900 MH/s263 W · 3.422 MH/s/W | |
| X15 | not supported | 900 MH/s270 W · 3.333 MH/s/W | |
| X17 | not supported | 900 MH/s263 W · 3.422 MH/s/W | |
| Xelishashv2 | 18 kH/s80 W · 225 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Zhash | 33 H/s80 W · 0.4125 H/s/W | not supported |