Imperium V2 vs SC1 Immersion
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 750 W | 1600 W | |
| Release | 2019-03 | ||
| Best opportunity |  CKBNetwork |  SCPNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-1.44 | $-3.00 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 33/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Imperium V2 | SC1 Immersion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2b-Sia) | not supported | 2.2 TH/s1600 W · 1.375 GH/s/W | |
| Blake (2b) | not supported | 2.2 TH/s1600 W · 1.375 GH/s/W | |
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | 12 GH/s750 W · 16 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Eaglesong | 23.4 GH/s750 W · 31.2 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Solidity-SHA3 | 30 GH/s1100 W · 27.27 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| vBlake2 | 18 GH/s750 W · 24 MH/s/W | not supported |