Imperium V1 vs A11
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 500 W | 2300 W | |
| Release | 2024-09 | ||
| Best opportunity |  CKBNetwork |  ETCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.96 | $-3.72 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Imperium V1 | A11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | 8 GH/s500 W · 16 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake3 | not supported | 1.2 TH/s2300 W · 521.7 MH/s/W | |
| Eaglesong | 15.6 GH/s500 W · 31.2 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Etchash | not supported | 1.5 GH/s2500 W · 600 kH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 1.5 GH/s2500 W · 600 kH/s/W | |
| SHA-256 | not supported | 72 TH/s3400 W · 21.18 GH/s/W | |
| SHA512256d | not supported | 3.2 TH/s2300 W · 1.391 GH/s/W | |
| Solidity-SHA3 | 20 GH/s720 W · 27.78 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| vBlake2 | 12 GH/s500 W · 24 MH/s/W | not supported |