Imperium V1 vs Giant+ A2000
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 500 W | 430 W | |
| Release | 2017-08 | ||
| Best opportunity |  CKBNetwork |  DASHNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.96 | $-0.82 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Imperium V1 | Giant+ A2000 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | 8 GH/s500 W · 16 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Eaglesong | 15.6 GH/s500 W · 31.2 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Quark | not supported | 2 GH/s248 W · 8.065 MH/s/W | |
| Qubit | not supported | 2 GH/s280 W · 7.143 MH/s/W | |
| Solidity-SHA3 | 20 GH/s720 W · 27.78 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| vBlake2 | 12 GH/s500 W · 24 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X11 | not supported | 2 GH/s430 W · 4.651 MH/s/W | |
| X13 | not supported | 1.6 GH/s430 W · 3.721 MH/s/W | |
| X14 | not supported | 1.6 GH/s450 W · 3.556 MH/s/W | |
| X15 | not supported | 2 GH/s450 W · 4.444 MH/s/W | |
| X17 | not supported | 1.6 GH/s440 W · 3.636 MH/s/W |