Imperium V1 vs BK-X
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 500 W | 630 W | |
| Release | 2017-11 | ||
| Best opportunity |  CKBNetwork |  DASHNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.96 | $-0.38 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Imperium V1 | BK-X | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | 8 GH/s500 W · 16 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Eaglesong | 15.6 GH/s500 W · 31.2 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Groestl | not supported | 10 GH/s210 W · 47.62 MH/s/W | |
| Myr-Groestl | not supported | 10 GH/s150 W · 66.67 MH/s/W | |
| NIST5 | not supported | 10 GH/s250 W · 40 MH/s/W | |
| Quark | not supported | 10 GH/s360 W · 27.78 MH/s/W | |
| Qubit | not supported | 10 GH/s390 W · 25.64 MH/s/W | |
| Skein | not supported | 5 GH/s120 W · 41.67 MH/s/W | |
| Solidity-SHA3 | 20 GH/s720 W · 27.78 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| vBlake2 | 12 GH/s500 W · 24 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X11 | not supported | 1.35 GH/s200 W · 6.75 MH/s/W |