Imperium V1 vs BK-G28
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 500 W | 1300 W | |
| Release | 2018-10 | ||
| Best opportunity |  CKBNetwork |  DASHNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.96 | $-0.84 | |
| Score | 49/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Imperium V1 | BK-G28 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | 8 GH/s500 W · 16 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Eaglesong | 15.6 GH/s500 W · 31.2 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Groestl | not supported | 28 GH/s450 W · 62.22 MH/s/W | |
| Myr-Groestl | not supported | 28 GH/s350 W · 80 MH/s/W | |
| NIST5 | not supported | 28 GH/s550 W · 50.91 MH/s/W | |
| Quark | not supported | 28 GH/s800 W · 35 MH/s/W | |
| Qubit | not supported | 28 GH/s850 W · 32.94 MH/s/W | |
| Skein | not supported | 14 GH/s300 W · 46.67 MH/s/W | |
| Solidity-SHA3 | 20 GH/s720 W · 27.78 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| vBlake2 | 12 GH/s500 W · 24 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X11 | not supported | 3.5 GH/s450 W · 7.778 MH/s/W |