Imperium F2 vs A11
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 990 W | 2300 W | |
| Release | 2024-09 | ||
| Best opportunity |  HNSNetwork |  ETCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-1.90 | $-3.62 | |
| Score | 40/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Imperium F2 | A11 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | 71 GH/s1050 W · 67.62 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Blake3 | not supported | 1.2 TH/s2300 W · 521.7 MH/s/W | |
| Etchash | not supported | 1.5 GH/s2500 W · 600 kH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 1.5 GH/s2500 W · 600 kH/s/W | |
| Handshake | 6.1 GH/s990 W · 6.162 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| SHA-256 | not supported | 72 TH/s3400 W · 21.18 GH/s/W | |
| SHA512256d | not supported | 3.2 TH/s2300 W · 1.391 GH/s/W | |
| Tellor | 9 GH/s780 W · 11.54 MH/s/W | not supported |