Imperium F2 vs Giant A900
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 990 W | 217 W | |
| Release | 2016-10 | ||
| Best opportunity |  HNSNetwork |  DASHNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-1.89 | $-0.41 | |
| Score | 40/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Imperium F2 | Giant A900 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | 71 GH/s1050 W · 67.62 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Handshake | 6.1 GH/s990 W · 6.162 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Quark | not supported | 900 MH/s132 W · 6.818 MH/s/W | |
| Qubit | not supported | 900 MH/s146 W · 6.164 MH/s/W | |
| Tellor | 9 GH/s780 W · 11.54 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X11 | not supported | 900 MH/s217 W · 4.147 MH/s/W | |
| X13 | not supported | 900 MH/s255 W · 3.529 MH/s/W | |
| X14 | not supported | 900 MH/s263 W · 3.422 MH/s/W | |
| X15 | not supported | 900 MH/s270 W · 3.333 MH/s/W | |
| X17 | not supported | 900 MH/s263 W · 3.422 MH/s/W |