Imperium F2 vs G28
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 990 W | 1300 W | |
| Release | |||
| Best opportunity |  HNSNetwork |  DASHNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-1.90 | $-2.30 | |
| Score | 40/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Imperium F2 | G28 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | 71 GH/s1050 W · 67.62 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Groestl | not supported | 28 GH/s450 W · 62.22 MH/s/W | |
| Handshake | 6.1 GH/s990 W · 6.162 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Myr-Groestl | not supported | 28 GH/s350 W · 80 MH/s/W | |
| NIST5 | not supported | 28 GH/s550 W · 50.91 MH/s/W | |
| Quark | not supported | 28 GH/s800 W · 35 MH/s/W | |
| Qubit | not supported | 28 GH/s850 W · 32.94 MH/s/W | |
| Skein | not supported | 14 GH/s300 W · 46.67 MH/s/W | |
| Tellor | 9 GH/s780 W · 11.54 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| X11 | not supported | 28 GH/s1300 W · 21.54 MH/s/W | |
| X11Gost | not supported | 3.5 GH/s450 W · 7.778 MH/s/W |