Phoenix vs Quadruple Mini Miner
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 3000 W | 160 W | |
| Release | 2016-08 | ||
| Best opportunity |  QKCNetwork |  DASHNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-2.16 | $-0.30 | |
| Score | 46/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | Phoenix | Quadruple Mini Miner | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethash | 2.6 GH/s3000 W · 866.7 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Quark | not supported | 600 MH/s100 W · 6 MH/s/W | |
| Qubit | not supported | 600 MH/s112 W · 5.357 MH/s/W | |
| X11 | not supported | 600 MH/s160 W · 3.75 MH/s/W | |
| X13 | not supported | 600 MH/s184 W · 3.261 MH/s/W | |
| X17 | not supported | 600 MH/s188 W · 3.191 MH/s/W |