X4-QZ vs SC1 Slim
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 340 W | 450 W | |
| Release | 2023-03 | 2019-01 | |
| Best opportunity |  QKCNetwork |  SCNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.0028 | $-0.37 | |
| Score | 55/100 | 32/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | X4-QZ | SC1 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2b-Sia) | not supported | 550 GH/s450 W · 1.222 GH/s/W | |
| Blake (2b) | not supported | 550 GH/s450 W · 1.222 GH/s/W | |
| Etchash | 840 MH/s340 W · 2.471 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 840 MH/s380 W · 2.211 MH/s/W | not supported |