X4-QZ vs Imperium F2
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 340 W | 990 W | |
| Release | 2023-03 | ||
| Best opportunity |  ETCNetwork |  HNSNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.27 | $-1.90 | |
| Score | 54/100 | 31/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | X4-QZ | Imperium F2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | not supported | 71 GH/s1050 W · 67.62 MH/s/W | |
| Etchash | 840 MH/s340 W · 2.471 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 840 MH/s380 W · 2.211 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Handshake | not supported | 6.1 GH/s990 W · 6.162 MH/s/W | |
| Tellor | not supported | 9 GH/s780 W · 11.54 MH/s/W |