X4-QZ vs F2
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | FPGA | |
| Power | 340 W | 1202 W | |
| Release | 2023-03 | ||
| Best opportunity |  QKCNetwork |  DGBNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $1.01 | $-1.39 | |
| Score | 69/100 | 28/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | X4-QZ | F2 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2s-Kadena) | not supported | 67.61 GH/s682 W · 99.13 MH/s/W | |
| Etchash | 840 MH/s340 W · 2.471 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 840 MH/s380 W · 2.211 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| KangarooTwelve | not supported | 65.88 GH/s912 W · 72.24 MH/s/W | |
| Keccak256 | not supported | 290 kH/s911 W · 318.3 H/s/W | |
| Odocrypt | not supported | 6.6 GH/s1202 W · 5.491 MH/s/W | |
| Tellor | not supported | 99.9 GH/s712 W · 140.3 MH/s/W |