X4-QZ vs BK-D
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 340 W | 500 W | |
| Release | 2023-03 | 2018-06 | |
| Best opportunity |  ETCNetwork | ||
| Profit/day | $-0.0011 | ||
| Score | 65/100 | ||
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | X4-QZ | BK-D | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (14r) | not supported | 280 GH/s550 W · 509.1 MH/s/W | |
| Etchash | 840 MH/s340 W · 2.471 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 840 MH/s380 W · 2.211 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| LBRY | not supported | 80 GH/s500 W · 160 MH/s/W | |
| Pascal | not supported | 70 GH/s550 W · 127.3 MH/s/W |