X4-Q vs SC1 Immersion
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 480 W | 1600 W | |
| Release | 2022-06 | 2019-03 | |
| Best opportunity |  QKCNetwork |  SCPNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $0.61 | $-2.99 | |
| Score | 66/100 | 33/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | X4-Q | SC1 Immersion | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2b-Sia) | not supported | 2.2 TH/s1600 W · 1.375 GH/s/W | |
| Blake (2b) | not supported | 2.2 TH/s1600 W · 1.375 GH/s/W | |
| Etchash | 1.04 GH/s480 W · 2.167 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 1.04 GH/s370 W · 2.811 MH/s/W | not supported |