X16-Q vs SC1 Slim
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 620 W | 450 W | |
| Release | 2023-05 | 2019-01 | |
| Best opportunity |  ETCNetwork |  SCPNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $0.43 | $-0.85 | |
| Score | 71/100 | 33/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | X16-Q | SC1 Slim | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (2b-Sia) | not supported | 550 GH/s450 W · 1.222 GH/s/W | |
| Blake (2b) | not supported | 550 GH/s450 W · 1.222 GH/s/W | |
| Etchash | 1.95 GH/s620 W · 3.145 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 1.95 GH/s630 W · 3.095 MH/s/W | not supported |