X16-Q vs Zig M1
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 620 W | 200 W | |
| Release | 2023-05 | 2018-11 | |
| Best opportunity |  ETCNetwork |  GRSNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $0.55 | $0.0073 | |
| Score | 73/100 | 40/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | X16-Q | Zig M1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etchash | 1.95 GH/s620 W · 3.145 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 1.95 GH/s630 W · 3.095 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Groestl | not supported | 2.61 GH/s200 W · 13.05 MH/s/W | |
| LBRY | not supported | 1.54 GH/s11 W · 140 MH/s/W | |
| Lyra2REv2 | not supported | 192 MH/s25 W · 7.68 MH/s/W | |
| Myr-Groestl | not supported | 4.3 GH/s220 W · 19.55 MH/s/W | |
| Pascal | not supported | 2.3 GH/s3 W · 766.7 MH/s/W |