X16-Q Pro vs Zig M1
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 520 W | 200 W | |
| Release | 2024-06 | 2018-11 | |
| Best opportunity |  ETCNetwork |  GRSNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $0.40 | $-0.09 | |
| Score | 72/100 | 40/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | X16-Q Pro | Zig M1 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Etchash | 2.05 GH/s520 W · 3.942 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | 2.05 GH/s520 W · 3.942 MH/s/W | not supported | |
| Groestl | not supported | 2.61 GH/s200 W · 13.05 MH/s/W | |
| LBRY | not supported | 1.54 GH/s11 W · 140 MH/s/W | |
| Lyra2REv2 | not supported | 192 MH/s25 W · 7.68 MH/s/W | |
| Myr-Groestl | not supported | 4.3 GH/s220 W · 19.55 MH/s/W | |
| Pascal | not supported | 2.3 GH/s3 W · 766.7 MH/s/W |