D9 DecredMaster vs X4-QZ
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 1000 W | 340 W | |
| Release | 2018-04 | 2023-03 | |
| Best opportunity |  ETCNetwork | ||
| Profit/day | $-0.0073 | ||
| Score | 65/100 | ||
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | D9 DecredMaster | X4-QZ | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Blake (14r) | 2.4 TH/s1000 W · 2.4 GH/s/W | not supported | |
| Etchash | not supported | 840 MH/s340 W · 2.471 MH/s/W | |
| Ethash | not supported | 840 MH/s380 W · 2.211 MH/s/W |