A9++ ZMaster vs GeForce RTX 2070 Super
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | GPU | |
| Power | 1550 W | 110 W | |
| Release | 2019-05 | ||
| Best opportunity | |||
| Profit/day | $8.29 | $0.10 | |
| Score | 83/100 | 71/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | A9++ ZMaster | GeForce RTX 2070 Super | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abelhash | not supported | 43 MH/s130 W · 330.8 kH/s/W | |
| Autolykos2 | not supported | 75 MH/s140 W · 535.7 kH/s/W | |
| Blake3 | not supported | 1 GH/s110 W · 9.091 MH/s/W | |
| DynexSolve | not supported | 3.6 kH/s110 W · 32.73 H/s/W | |
| Equihash | 140 kH/s1550 W · 90.32 H/s/W | not supported | |
| Ethash | not supported | 41 MH/s140 W · 292.9 kH/s/W | |
| EvrProgPow | not supported | 24 MH/s150 W · 160 kH/s/W | |
| FiroPoW | not supported | 21 MH/s140 W · 150 kH/s/W | |
| FishHash | not supported | 28.5 MH/s110 W · 259.1 kH/s/W | |
| GhostRider | not supported | 870 H/s130 W · 6.692 H/s/W | |
| Hoohash | not supported | 200 MH/s80 W · 2.5 MH/s/W | |
| IronFish | not supported | 10 GH/s110 W · 90.91 MH/s/W | |
| KAWPOW | not supported | 24 MH/s150 W · 160 kH/s/W | |
| KHeavyHash | not supported | 450 MH/s100 W · 4.5 MH/s/W | |
| Memehash | not supported |