A10 vs BK-G28
Side-by-side mining comparison: specs, per-algorithm benchmarks, efficiency and current profitability.
| Type | ASIC | ASIC | |
| Power | 750 W | 1300 W | |
| Release | 2019-09 | 2018-10 | |
| Best opportunity | ∞Multi NiceHash |  DASHNetwork | |
| Profit/day | $-0.54 | $-0.85 | |
| Score | 40/100 | 49/100 | |
| View details → | View details → |
Benchmarks by algorithm
Best available benchmark per device; efficiency = hashrate per watt.
| Algorithm | A10 | BK-G28 | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ethash | 480 MH/s750 W · 640 kH/s/W | not supported | |
| Groestl | not supported | 28 GH/s450 W · 62.22 MH/s/W | |
| Myr-Groestl | not supported | 28 GH/s350 W · 80 MH/s/W | |
| NIST5 | not supported | 28 GH/s550 W · 50.91 MH/s/W | |
| Quark | not supported | 28 GH/s800 W · 35 MH/s/W | |
| Qubit | not supported | 28 GH/s850 W · 32.94 MH/s/W | |
| Skein | not supported | 14 GH/s300 W · 46.67 MH/s/W | |
| X11 | not supported | 3.5 GH/s450 W · 7.778 MH/s/W |